Roberta lives in Fairfax, California with her boyfriend, Wil, and his daughter, Zoe. She tutors part time at The College of Marin and is a caregiver to her mother, Dorothy. She has previously published non-fiction in The Southern California Review and fiction in The Writer’s Digest Show Us Your Shorts Collection.
Before she ran off to California with Wil, she was the Head Women’s Cross Country, Track and Field Coach at Rutgers University in New Jersey for twenty-three years. She also taught Expository Writing at Rutgers, where she earned a Ph.D. in English in 1982. An avid runner herself, she was the first woman to compete in the sport at Villanova University as an undergraduate. Her novella, My Bo and Me, was based on her experiences as a coach and athlete and placed in the Miami University Novella Contest.
She is grateful to Tom Centolella and all the writers in his creative writing class for their insights and ongoing support over the years.
Take the time to read Roberta’s story, "House Rules,"
and then come back to see what she has to say about writing this story and writing
in general.
WOW: What was the
inspiration behind “House Rules”?
Roberta: First,
I’d like to thank you for recognizing my story in your wonderful contest. I’m thrilled to have taken part and to be
recognized among such fine writers. Your
staff has been so encouraging as well, and that means a lot to a novice writer.
Two
things inspired the story: the character
of my former landlady when I was in my twenties and a break-up with my
then-boyfriend. In real life, my
boyfriend left a stuffed animal in the vestibule with a note. My landlady called me up right away to let me
know. But I wondered what would’ve
happened if she had chosen not to call me!
I decided to write the story to find out. I didn’t know the ending, really, until I
wrote it. I just got into her head and let her talk.
WOW: How
do you decide which details to include and which to leave out? For example, we
learn the dog’s name but not the boyfriend’s name.
Roberta:
This is a great question. I tried to stay in character, so to speak, and chose
details as I thought she would’ve chosen them.
Cuddles, the dog, was integral to her life and someone she would
acknowledge by name. The boyfriend was someone she wanted gone, and by not
naming him she could, in a sense, deny his existence.
I
should confess that this story was 1250 words when I first wrote it. I was
stuck for something to write for my writing class and looked up a random prompt
online. The prompt said to dig out an
old story that somehow didn’t make it. Then, without re-reading it, reduce it
to its essence. I decided to take a shot
at it with this story. When I finished,
I could not believe that I had cut out approximately 750 words! When I finally did re-read the original
story, I also couldn’t believe that I once thought all those other words and
details were interesting. What was I
thinking?! In this case, less was
definitely more. I’d kept Mrs. Bradley’s
character intact and was able to tell the story without the irrelevancies that
had somehow charmed me in the first draft.
Perhaps the fact that the story had sat in a drawer for several years
made it easier for me to give those details up.
I was less attached.
WOW: That’s quite a reduction in total word count.
Great job! But you are also an academic. What did you learn working towards
your PhD in English that our readers would find helpful?
Roberta:
Hmmmm . . . certainly I read lots of incredible literature and that gave me
some insight into what it looked like.
Analyzing great writing made me realize how important each word is, what
the rhythm of a sentence did for the flow of a work, how form and punctuation
helped define meaning. It brought me in very close to what it meant to compose.
But
writing about literature and actually trying to create it feel very different
to me. I’ve never viewed myself as a
very creative person; academia, although quite difficult, came more
easily. I felt more comfortable (and
maybe less exposed?) when reviewing someone else’s writing than when trying to
put my own on a blank page.
The
other aspect of grad study that helped me, and would help anyone trying to
write, is the discipline required.
Earning the PhD was an endurance exercise. I wish I could marshal more of that focus now
when trying to write fiction.
WOW: Tell us
about your writing routine. How has it changed since you retired?
Roberta: Well, I
never had any routine before I retired because I was always working and had no
time to write. I think I wrote one
creative piece in 23 years! As a college
track coach, I recruited in the evening and traveled on the weekends. And as a
teacher I was always grading papers. So my
writing only began once I retired.
At
first, I was pretty dedicated and would write each day. I got up each morning, went for a run, ate
breakfast, and then sat down for a few hours to write. I attended Tom
Centolella’s writing class at The College of Marin and loved, loved, loved
going back to school and having someone else teach me. He was and still is an inspiring
teacher.
But now, as a caregiver to my
mom, I find less and less time and energy for writing. I remember reading about
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s experience at Brook Farm, where a community of fabulous
writers thought working the land together would enrich their writing. But real
life on the farm was exhausting, and they found it very difficult to be
creative after a hard day’s work. I find
that to be true now as well. Caregiving
is enriching in its own way and I wouldn’t trade it, but it leaves little room
for pondering and ruminating—which I find necessary for writing. So, these
days, I try to improve some old pieces like House Rules and write short pieces
when I can.
WOW: A lot of our readers are probably in the same
position, trying to squeeze writing in around family responsibilities. Like you, they might find that writing short
and rewriting might be the way to go. What
final words of advice do you have for anyone who is new to writing flash
fiction?
Roberta:
The “flash” is important, so the prose can’t have much heaviness. Put it all down on paper and then re-work and
distill. Put it aside for a while and
then come back to it. You’ll be a bit
more ruthless once you’ve let go of those favorite phrases and details that may
be weighing your prose down. Also, read
it to your friends and fellow writers.
If they don’t “get it,” believe them and review your story. I had a lot of trouble understanding why my
friends didn’t grasp my 1250 word version of House Rules. But they were right and I’m glad they were
honest.
WOW: Thank you for your answers! Using POV to
determine what details to
include would also help strengthen my characters. Thank you for the advice. I’m looking forward to reading more of your work.
include would also help strengthen my characters. Thank you for the advice. I’m looking forward to reading more of your work.
Interviewed
by Sue Bradford Edwards
2 comments:
Sue--Thanks for doing this interview.
Roberta--Your story "House Rules" has certainly been stripped down to the bare bones. I enjoyed it (and even chuckled a couple of times).
Good luck with your future writing endeavors. And enjoy your mother while you can...
Great interview questions and interesting/helpful answers. Congratulations Roberta on your top ten contest win!
Post a Comment