Sign up for our FREE Email Newsletter

Sunday, January 20, 2019

 

What a Writer Wants... What a Writer Needs



                                           Yeah, I get my title doesn't trip off the tongue like the lyrics
                                                      of the Christina Aguilera song, but hey, what can I say?
                                                              It's that pesky extra syllable that's to blame...

Here's an idea of what filled up too much of my time lately during my holiday break--as I waited for feedback from Margo Dill, an editor extraordinaire:

6:17 a.m. Maybe my editor is up early, she finished looking over my manuscript and sent me her critique today. She's had it for 14 days. Yeah, Christmas Eve and Christmas day were two of those 14 days, but two weeks is enough time to critique 50,000 words, right?

12:30 p.m. I went out for four hours, knowing that when I got back, my critique would be in my inbox.

5:20 p.m. Margo has probably parked her daughter in front of a game system for hours and hours so she can finish reading my manuscript. Dinnertime? She can toss her kiddo a bag of chips and a 2-liter bottle of soda and say, "Bon appetit!" Isn't that a reasonable expectation?

8:16 p.m. Ohmygodohmygodohmygod. It's an email from Margo. Oh. It's not about my manuscript. It's about something else. Doesn't she know that whenever I see an email from anyone whose name begins with a M, I start to squeal at such a high pitch, my family's been wearing earplugs? Why is she teasing me like this?

8:27 p.m. A friend emailed me: Margo is busy judging a WOW writing contest, and she has a client who got a book deal, so probably Margo is doing some last-minute edits for them. Why does a national contest and a book-about-to-get-printed-and-put-on-bookstore-shelves take precedence over my manuscript? Ain't I important, too? And I've been so patient...

Yes, this is an exaggeration when it comes to my expectations (although I minimized the 149 number of times I've checked--daily--my email), and I don't advocate parents feeding their child potato chips and sugary soda for dinner, with electronics as a babysitter. When it comes to writers with book deals and obligations like judging a writing contest, I'm at the bottom of the priority list--as I should be. I'm just trying to paint the picture of an impatient writer and show the craziness that's in our heads sometimes... which leads me to thinking what is the difference between what we want and what we need.

I'd love an email from my editor early in the process, something like, "Sioux, the beginning of this story is great. The more I read, the more I'm lovin' it."  The problem? One, that's not how professionals do it and two, what happens if 20 pages into the manuscript, the story tanks? I want some preliminary feedback. However, what I need is critique on the whole manuscript. After all, it is hopefully a cohesive and compelling piece, from the first word to the last line.

I'd love to have an editor who devotes all their time to my manuscript. I want them to put aside their other work, their other clients, their other obligations and focus on just me. The problem? An editor who is not well-rounded and doesn't have a life to live is not going to be a decent writer or critic (in my opinion). And an editor who doesn't have other clients means they lack experience. What I need is an editor who can juggle many different projects at once, who is in demand enough that they have to juggle several jobs simultaneously.

I'd love to get my manuscript critiqued in a few days. A week, tops. Isn't that enough time to read it and make notes of any minor changes that are needed? Yes, I want it fast. Instantly. But what I need is thorough, and thorough can't be done quickly. If my editor rushes through reading my work, they might miss some plot holes, some character mix-ups. They might gloss over the draggy parts in their hurry to get back to me.

And now, I'm off to check my email. Again. I made a little bet with myself: if I took the time and wrote this post, by the time I finished, the critique would be in my inbox...


Sioux Roslawski did hear from her editor in a timely manner and she got a big thumbs-up from Margo. In the next couple of weeks she'll make some minor revisions and then begin sending it out. Sioux got what she wanted--encouraging and constructive feedback and she got what she needed--a critique that missed none of the tiny details but at the same time, kept the bigger picture in mind.


Labels: , ,

10 Comments:

Blogger Nicole Pyles said...

Haha I love this post and can completely relate!! It reminds me of my job search and at this point, my best option for myself is apply and pretend I've already forgotten about it, because when I obsess over whyyyy the company I was perfect for hasn't called me yet I do terribly!

3:12 PM  
Blogger Angela said...

Waiting is excruciating, isn't it?! I'm glad your ms came back with a glowing review. I've heard it's fantastic and you're an amazing writer. I'm excited for you, Sioux! :)

5:55 PM  
Blogger Margo Dill said...

Hahahahaha. Thank goodness I did get it back to you before this post published. LOL I guess it's the thinking inbetween the reading that I can't put a time limit on. . .I do notice that when I don't have to rush, I actually feel like I have done a better job. :) Anyway, it was really great and I look forward to talking to you on the phone on Wednesday! Margo

6:33 PM  
Blogger Sioux Roslawski said...

Nicole--I tried to forget I was waiting for the critique. It didn't last too long. ;)

Angela--Thanks for the kind words. Now, if I can only write a fabulous query letter...

Margo--I imagine giving a critique on a manuscript is like homemade chili. It's never good right away. You have to let all the flavors mingle, give it a bit of time... Thanks for taking the time...

9:45 PM  
Blogger Cathy C. Hall said...

Patience is a virtue I sorely lack and being in the writing business hasn't helped!

Good luck with Round Two, Sioux!

6:45 AM  
Blogger Lisa Ricard Claro said...

Ah, patience! It isn't in my toolbox either, Sioux.

12:21 PM  
Blogger Sioux Roslawski said...

Cathy--Thanks. I'm going to need it (the patience AND the good luck).

Lisa--Send me some wine and some potato chips. That does sound like a good combo.

4:43 PM  
Blogger Pat Wahler said...

Awaiting feedback on a manuscript is always nail-biting time for me!

5:36 PM  
Blogger Sioux Roslawski said...

Pat--You had such a fabulous 2018, your nails are still long unbitten. :)

3:54 PM  
Blogger Mary Horner said...

I love this post, Sioux, you captured the angst and anticipation of waiting, which is what writers need to do A LOT! And you made me laugh! Thanks for putting into words the emotions I've felt while waiting to hear from an editor.

10:20 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts