Showing posts with label Friday Speak Out!. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Friday Speak Out!. Show all posts

Friday Speak Out!: I Can Speak Clearly Now

Friday, July 24, 2026
By Sophie Berghouse

I have been a mother much longer than a writer. My first child was born a decade and a half before my first essay publication.

When I was younger, I pictured doing the two simultaneously: the babies would nap for hours, and I would effortlessly work on my (obviously best-selling) memoir. Reality, it turns out, wanted nothing to do with my dreams; I found parenting to be so intense and time-consuming, the only writing I eked out were grocery lists.

Fast forward fifteen years. As the tasks of motherhood ebbed, my long-quieted dream of writing started rousing in the cob-webbed corners of my brain. I had always thought of the two—parenting and creative writing— as distinct careers, two separate chapters of my life’s book. Other than the intense time component, I never saw a common denominator.

Last night, my teenage son accused my equally-teenage daughter of being wasteful as she refused to eat the watermelon all the way to the rind.

“You only ate, like, half the red. Eat it to the white part,” my son said, the accusation swollen with emotion. It was as if we were witnessing the crescendo moment of a juried murder trial. It was her. She- (eyes narrowing, finger pointed accusingly) didn’t- eat- the- watermelon- to- the- …dramatic pause… end.”

Newton famously claimed that every force exerts an equal and opposite return. It turns out, teenagers are also subject to these same laws of physics.

“And YOU,” my daughter replied standing up to gain authority, her chair toppling behind her. “You- never- eat- the- pizza crust. EVER,” her tone equally menacing.

I had to intervene before we had a crime of passion in our dining room. Yet, I felt a familiar dread. How would I find the right words, something authoritative but non-judgmental? Both were equally right. And equally wrong.

In another era, I would have launched directly into words. I would have grasped at each thought that ricocheted through my brain blurting them out in staccato, mostly incoherent segments. There would have been no structure to my thoughts, but rather a potpourri of ideas: “respect each other, I like eating pizza crust anyways, watch your language, stay cognizant of emotions.”

After stumbling around, I would inevitably land on, “Stop. I said STOP.” This usually worked for a good three seconds before they would re-launch into debate. Inevitably, I would exit in fury, stage right.

As the rind discussion intensified, I jumped in. “You keep talking past each other. This is escalating beyond your control. Your sister is upset because she was enjoying her dessert, and your tone and volume shocked her. Maybe try gently nudging instead of a sledgehammer approach next time. Also, let’s question whether pizza edges and fruit peels are worth our emotional energy.”

Did I just say all that? Did I make those coherent, pithy sentences? It was like I was reading from a well-thought out script, not off-the-cuff emotions. And it worked. They stepped back, grunted, and moved on.

I stood in awe of myself. Since when did I have accessible vocabulary and comprehensible arguments?

Parenting and writing do have a common denominator.

* * *

Sophie writes often about the intersection of motherhood and writing. Instead of working on her memoir of parenting a disabled child, she daydreams about having an illustrious writing career. Until then, you can find her, hair disheveled, clothes tattered, knee-deep in the trenches of parenting. Or on Substack ( https://substack.com/@sophieberghouse).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: Characters without Characteristics

Friday, July 10, 2026
By Fran Hawthorne

From the first draft of my most recent novel, Her Daughter, I knew that I needed to strip its characters of almost any identifiable trace of religion, ethnic background, nationality, or race.

That's because the story centers on a type of domestic abuse called Parental Alienation, where one parent deliberately gaslights the children to turn them against the other parent. I didn't want readers to think they could wave off the gaslighting parent's horrible behavior as something that only "they" (insert ethnic bias) do, that "our kind of people" would never do.

As writers, we work hard to give our characters vivid quirks, habits, speech patterns, and hairstyles. I didn't realize how difficult it would be to take some of that away--how much even the smallest ethnic clues are woven into our everyday lives.

For starters, my characters have white-bread names, such as Alice Wilson and Robert Corning, which could come from Northern European heritage or could have been changed on Ellis Island. The only holidays they celebrate are secular ones like Halloween and Mother's Day. The daughter of the title eats Cheerios as a baby and organic strawberries and wheat germ as a picky teen, but never bagels, churros, or pho.

No chapter takes place during December, because in the contemporary U.S., a family at that time of year would probably be brainstorming gift ideas for ... uh, which December festival?

Almost the only clues I allowed were occasional bits of description--"sun-blonde ponytail," "wild brown hair," "dark blue eyes"--because I think readers deserve some visual landmarks.

For a while, my self-imposed limits were an intellectual challenge, but not too onerous--akin to avoiding crutch words like "just" and "often." Until the funeral scene.

That scene is an important turning point in the narrative. However, commemorations of death are also key elements of cultures and religions. How soon after death is a person buried? How, when, and where would family and friends gather to remember the deceased?

If they gather at the funeral home before the burial--that's a Catholic wake. If they gather at the person's home after the burial--that's a Jewish shiva.

Couldn't I bury the dead in peace?

Oh, I wished I could simply write about the contemporary, secular-Jewish families that peopled my first two novels and that I'm comfortable with! How easily an "oy" would type itself into a round of dialogue, a bagel onto a breakfast platter.

And you know what? It's a good thing I couldn't.

Sure, fictional characters need the richness of ethnic food, names, music, and holidays, but they also need to have an unexpected mix of qualities--the same as real people do. Writing this book stretched me to think of new ways of describing my characters, without the easy cultural tags. I think they're better people because of it.

***

photo credit Jolene Siana
During her award-winning journalism career, FRAN HAWTHORNE wrote eight nonfiction books, mainly about consumer activism, the drug industry, and the financial world. She's also been an editor or regular contributor for Business Week, The New York Times, and many other publications. Her first two novels, The Heirs and I Meant to Tell You, were published in 2018 and 2022 by Stephen F. Austin State University Press and together won or were named a finalist for seven awards, including the Eric Hoffer Book Awards and the Sarton Award. HER DAUGHTER, Fran's third novel, was published in January 2026 by Black Rose Writing. She's at work on Number 4 from her home in Brooklyn, NY. Learn more at https://www.hawthornewriter.com/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: We Got This

Friday, June 12, 2026
I plural myself like no other.

“I’m going inside now. Do we have all our things?” I think to myself as I open the sliding glass door that separates my balcony office from my living room office. We’re a freelance editor. We work from home and must spice it up with multiple office-i.

But it’s awkward to write in plural when talking about a singular me. It’s not an identity thing, just that there are two people in my head (and not in a psychotic way; I don’t think).

These people, more than just voices, keep me company and help me sort through my brain. Ever since I was a teen when I experienced those gawky identity- and friend-shifting high school years, I’ve always known that I have to be my best friend. I’m stuck with me for life. Plus, I can’t hang with you if I’m not comfortable hanging with me. With us. So these people in my head—there’s just two of them actually. The writer and the editor. They’re both me, and they can be a nerdy blast to be with. “We’re done editing! Time to play with our own writing!” Grand idea.

So I chill with us all day, sitting in one of the four offices I have created in my one-bedroom apartment. Although I do have a roommate. She has four legs. And she’s, like, Velcroed to our leg all day. And yes, we talk to her too, but when she says something, it always comes out as a high-pitched blue heeler bitching noise. An irritated work wife because we’re editing and she wants to play.

“We’re not doing that right now, Babygirl. We’re working. Take a nap.”

So we write and edit and talk to our dog and ourself out loud. We’re very content in this position because it’s done grand things for us. As in: to be a good writer, you have to be a fantastic editor. Meaning, you have to be able to separate yourself from your writing self—to see the writing for what it is and not as yours. The writer self creates; the editor self employs the science of figuring out how to make what the writer self just wrote sound like something that someone who is not us would want to read.

My writer self negotiates with my editor self all day, and a constant conversation emerges between us about what’s working and what’s not. That separated perspective. We like this. How it results in publications and clients who trust ourself enough to pay us to apply editor self to their personal words. So we like ourself, our brain. Sometimes, our body. And 87.3% of the time, it’s all fun and uplifting. There are hard days, of course, when we hate ourselves for various self-loathing reasons including rejections and lack of work and an uncooperative roommate/coworker. Pep talks galore during these times. “We got this,” a phrase my walls are sick of hearing. But mostly, we’re just being us and we’re fine with that. I might sound a little crazy, but plural me away. It’s how we work—how our writing works.

* * *

Chelsey Clammer is the award-winning author of the essay collections Human Heartbeat Detected (Red Hen Press, 2022), Circadian (Red Hen Press, 2017), and BodyHome (Hopewell Publications, 2015). Her work has appeared in Salon, The Rumpus, Brevity, and McSweeney’s, among many others. She was the Fall 2019 Jack Kerouac Writer-in-Residence with the Jack Kerouac Project. Clammer teaches online creative writing classes with WOW! Women On Writing. She is a full-time freelance editor living in Austin. www.chelseyclammer.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: A Worthwhile Conference

Friday, March 13, 2026
By GP Gottlieb

I just returned from Left Coast Crime, a conference for mystery lovers. Of the 550 or so participants, there were about 70 authors, and the rest are readers looking for books to read. Guess who’s got 3 published mysteries (and a 4th launch coming this summer)?

Soon after I got to the hotel, I ran into Ann, a fellow Rocky Mountain Sister in Crime. I love her series about a doctor balancing work and family (loosely based on Ann’s life, except for the crime).

My conference plan is always to meet as many people as possible, have as many good conversations as I can manage, and leave the hotel at least once a day. We lucked out with sunny weather the whole time and the city was cleaner than when I last visited, but what did San Francisco do with all the street people?

I brought postcards with one of my excellent recipes on one side and my books and contact info on the other. I also brought wrapped chocolates and candy because it’s nice to offer something sweet to everyone. I set out some of that candy during author-speed-dating, where I spoke to about 15 tables of 8-10 people about my latest culinary mystery (Charred, Book #3 in the Whipped & Sipped Mystery series).

I will admit that after describing the book 10 times, I zipped through my allotted two minutes in less than 30 seconds. I’d stand up and say, “Hi, I wrote a Chicago based culinary mystery in which some people get killed and everyone else eats breakfast and lunch. Here’s some candy. Hope you get a chance to try my recipe.”

They’d laugh, probably relieved. I’d pass out the other author’s bookmarks, sit down, and listen to her speak. When it was over, I went to my room and read. Then I attended panels like Writing Historical Mysteries and Crime in the Great Outdoors. All four days, I ran into Ann from Colorado.

There were 4 panels each day, plus famous author interviews and readings (One played Tartini’s Devil’s Trill on the violin – his book had the same title). I make quicker decisions about reading a book after hearing an author read (or perform) than I do when listening to an author blab about his/her book.

I loved getting to moderate a panel on Global Mysteries and sitting on a panel about Mystery Categories, although whenever I was the last to answer a question about why my book is a cozy, or what differentiates cozy from traditional mystery, I’d forget the question, say whatever sprang to mind, and inadvertently get a laugh. Oops.

I came away with a long list of books to download, but my favorite part of the weekend was hanging out with Ann, who also ended up being on my flight to Denver. We ate together before the flight. Even though the conference is about books, for me the most important part is the people.

* * *

Photo credit: David Gottlieb 
G.P. Gottlieb loves her family, books, music, and dessert. Her three culinary mysteries (Battered, Smothered, and Charred) were re-issued by Anamcara Press this year (Pounded, Book 4 in the Whipped & Sipped series, will launch this summer). She has interviewed over 275 authors for New Books in Literature, a podcast channel on the New Books Network, has published stories and essays in a variety of journals, blogs, and anthologies, and her latest story will appear in the 2nd Rocky Mountain Sisters in Crime Mystery Merge. To connect, read her book reviews and essays, or see her stunning photos of roasted vegetables, visit G.P. Gottlieb on Facebook, Instagram, Substack, or GPGottlieb.Com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: THIS IS MY LAST BOOK…BUT THAT DOESN’T MEAN I’VE STOPPED WRITING

Friday, February 13, 2026
By Deborah K. Shepherd

Honestly, no one was more surprised than I was when I published my first book at 74.When I retired from a decades-long career directing non-profits, where I wrote detailed—very detailed—grants asking for funding, and even more detailed reports accounting for how the money was spent, I swore I’d never write anything longer or more complicated than a grocery list.

But then, looking for community, I signed up for a writing workshop at my local senior college, came home from the first class and announced to my husband, “I think I’m writing a novel.”

A few years after that, I was lucky enough to have said novel, So Happy Together, published by She Writes Press, and in the meantime, some of my smaller pieces were finding homes in on-line indie magazines.

I was one and done on the book front, though. In addition to the years spent writing; revising; editing; proofing; engaging both a developmental editor and a copy editor; submitting to agents; and being rejected over and over again, there was the year after acceptance intensely promoting and marketing the book first with a publicist and a social media consultant, and then the next few years selling the book on my own at indie bookstores, book fairs, and even farmers’ markets.

I didn’t need to and never intended to write a second book, let alone a memoir about my age-gap marriage to my first husband.

But then, one day…well, actually three years later, I found myself with 300 pages of a new manuscript in my hands. Some of it had been joyful to write, some of it had been gut-wrenching, but there it was. And I’m so happy that An Old Man’s Darling has found a home with Heliotrope Books. It’s out in the world right now—and I’ve just turned 79.

So, I really AM done writing books. I don’t have the impetus to start another one, nor the stamina to see it through to fruition.

But I still love writing, maybe for publication (waiting six months for an acceptance of an essay is a LOT easier than birthing a book) or maybe not. I’m finding that writing to prompts from my local writers’ group—100 words from the point of view of an animal, anyone?—or reading one of my essays at an open mic, or even just scribbling for myself when something jogs my writer’s brain---like the piece I jotted down on hearing The Beatles’ “When I’m 64” at the age of 78 and know I’ll probably never submit—still brings a sweet kind of pride and satisfaction.

So, I hope I never lose this desire to write--it feels like such a gift as I am poised to enter my 9th decade.

And, who knows, maybe I’ll even turn my grocery lists into haikus.

***

Deborah K. Shepherd’s first novel, So Happy Together, was published in 2021 when she was 74. Her essays have appeared in Oldster Magazine; Fauxmoir; Motherwell Magazine; Herstry; Eat. Darling, Eat; Persimmon Tree, and more, and her Covid-themed essay was a winner in the Center for Interfaith Relations 2020 Sacred Essay Contest. A retired social worker, she spent much of her career focused on the prevention of domestic violence and sexual assault and the provision of services to survivors. The mother of two and grandmother of two, Deborah lives in Maine with one husband and one sweet, jaunty rescue dog. You can find her at deborahshepherdwrites.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: WHAT NEWSPAPERS TAUGHT ME ABOUT WRITING FICTION

Friday, January 09, 2026
By Fran Hawthorne

Who? What? When? Where? Why?

For 30 years, that list was drummed into me and my colleagues by the editors at the newspapers and magazines where we worked: Give your readers the facts. Provable facts. No highfalutin' language. No opinions. The facts will tell the story.

A few factual adjectives were permitted. A city council meeting might be crowded, loud, even "spirited." A criminal suspect--especially, of course, one who was still at large--could be described as short, tall, heavyset (never "fat"), blond, elderly. Our ultimate workaround was to sneak in a direct quote from someone who used an adjective or two.

In any case, with our stories usually confined to strict wordcount limits, we had no room for adjectives. As for adverbs? They barely existed.

In a meeting that ran past midnight, and after two years of debate, the City Council yesterday voted 8 to 7 to allow low-income housing on a former warehouse site on the east side.

That's almost flash fiction, isn't it?

Now, however--ah, now I write novels. Now I can actually play with words like: scared, uncertain, miserable, eagerly, carefully.

But here's the thing: I rarely do.

If journalists are taught the five Ws, fiction-writers are just as powerfully imbued with the demand to "show, don't tell."

I don't want to outright tell my readers that Alice, in my new novel HER DAUGHTER, is nervous about meeting with her daughter and her ex-husband. I want readers to feel her nervousness, through the way that she prepares a detailed list of things to say and arrives early at their designated Starbucks in order to scout out tables. She wishes she'd ordered a muffin so that she could keep her fingers busy picking it apart. She knocks over her coffee cup. Maybe I'll even have her best friend urge her beforehand not to be nervous.

After all these years, I've grown into my hybrid style. Call it journafiction? I don't want a lot of fussy little descriptive tics.

Still, I'm glad to have a few stunning or exhilarating (but not tired) adjectives and adverbs in my palette, to be used occasionally and judiciously (but not extravagantly).

* * *

During her award-winning journalism career, FRAN HAWTHORNE wrote eight nonfiction books, mainly about consumer activism, the drug industry, and the financial world. She’s also been an editor or regular contributor for Business Week, The New York Times, and many other publications. Her first two novels, The Heirs and I Meant to Tell You, were published in 2018 and 2022 by Stephen F. Austin State University Press and together won or were named a finalist for seven awards, including the Eric Hoffer Book Awards and the Sarton Award. HER DAUGHTER, Fran’s third novel, will be published in January 2026 by Black Rose Writing. She’s at work on Number 4 from her home in Brooklyn, NY. Learn more at hawthornewriter.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: Are you writing an autobiography or a memoir?

Friday, January 02, 2026
By Ronit Plank

One of the first topics I cover in my memoir writing classes is the difference between autobiography and memoir. Because they share the same Dewey Decimal call numbers in libraries and are often grouped together in bookstores, there is a tendency to think of these two kinds of first-person nonfiction narratives as the same. But they are quite different and when we better understand what sets memoir apart, we can write and revise our manuscripts that resonate and shimmer.

Perhaps the most obvious way is that autobiography is often an account of an entire life or career, while memoir focuses on a specific period of time or experience. Autobiography can include every single event the writer feels called to share whereas memoir is about transformation and requires writers to be far more selective and self-aware.

If you’re contemplating dipping your toe into memoir, here are a few elements that can help infuse your manuscript with tension and complexity.

You the character and you the narrator

Memoir is distinct as a genre in that it asks of the memoirist to craft not only a compelling “I” character but also a reflective narrator, one who can highlight patterns and amplify stakes for that “I” character. In memoir the narrator-you is there to make meaning from what has occurred and guide the reader through your journey of self-discovery. When you harness this reflective narrative voice you ratchet up the stakes for the character-you and help keep the reader invested in you and turning the page.

Less what happened and more how it matters

Memoir is less about the particulars of what happened and more about why that matters now. The driving force of your narrative is that of a curious mind at work pushing for greater understanding about how and why the events you depict have their hooks in you and hound you; why you revisit them again and again in search for clarity. If you have already written a bit of material but feel you need more tension, more stakes, ask yourself what work your chapters are doing, what dynamic they show and how they provide opportunities for narrator-you to interrogate your behavior.

The question your memoir is asking

At their heart, memoirs are a story of becoming and when we gain insight about the central question our memoir is asking, we can structure our manuscript in dynamic and resonant ways. The central question has to do with what is still unsolved in you, the memoirist that has you revisiting your experience to try to make sense of it. And one of the most fascinating aspects of memoir is that the more you excavate your story, the clearer the question you’re asking becomes.

For me the thrill of memoir is knowing that when we approach our stories with curiosity, courage, and self-awareness we have the opportunity to create satisfying narrative arcs in our manuscripts as well as profound growth and change in our lives.

* * *

Sarah Anne Photography
Ronit Plank is a writer, teacher, and editor whose work has appeared in The Atlantic, Poets & Writers, The Rumpus, Hippocampus, The New York Times, and elsewhere, earning Best of the Net, Best Microfiction, and multiple Pushcart Prize nominations. Kirkus Reviews calls her debut memoir When She Comes Back, “An intimate, intuitive, emotionally vivid family account that finds hope in reconciliation". Ronit teaches memoir online at University of Washington’s Continuum Program, hosts the podcast Let’s Talk Memoir, and publishes monthly memoir craft advice on her Let’s Talk Memoir Substack.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: An Academic Gets Creative

by Rebecca Knuth

Trading an academic writing style for a creative one has been such a relief. The holistic permission that is retirement allowed me to cast off my straightjacket and write something I hadn’t even known existed—creative nonfiction. Finding a voice and writing with enthusiasm was hard, but oh so satisfying. I claimed myself as a writer and a woman.

The how-to-of-it meant a complete lifestyle change—moving to London, enrolling in a writing program, and reinventing myself. Creative writers are attuned differently, I thought. I set out to develop a ruminative mind-set and live a non-fiction kind of life. Changing my circumstances and shedding professional identity would foster internal percolation, the subconscious processing of thoughts, that fed expressiveness.

Over two years, I learned that popular writers have a different purpose and audience. Academics write to establish and maintain territory. The tenure system (where publications are currency) is based on judgment by peers, and how you slice and dice your work is often as important as what you are writing about. Those who can’t or won’t conform won’t be published. My dream of being creative meant something antithetical to academia—originality.

Voice and presence within one’s writing mattered, so I rebelliously shed a disciplinary mode that demanded detachment. Transitioning from academic writing meant saying “yes” to self-revelation, putting my thoughts and opinions out there. Showing that there was a moving mind (and heart!) behind my sentences.

Creative nonfiction is a genre of narrative in which an author tells a true story, using the techniques of fiction (evocative scenes, dialogue, and plot). For my course, I wrote a book called Emily Dickinson Had to Have Curls: The Feminist Masks Forced on Women Writers, which fell short of creative nonfiction. But it was illuminating (for me especially) and I became a confirmed feminist. While Emily Dickinson was good practice, I hit my CNF stride with London Sojourn: Rewriting Life After Retirement, a memoir coming out on January 27, 2026.

How I say something is super important because words are my conduit to readers. When I wrote my first academic book, Libricide: The Regime-sponsored Destruction of Books and Libraries in the Twentieth Century, I felt like I had climbed the mountain, Martin Luther King-style, and what I had to say was really important. It was however so densely written that even my mother nodded off when reading it. With London Sojourn, I am similarly exhilarated, though it’s a different mountain, with a much greater portion of the accomplishment in the writing.

It's a true story about transitioning, evolving, and writing my way to self-understanding. I tell many different stories and take readers on a ride through life change and a city beloved to book-lovers and writers. London Sojourn is accessibly written for those who want that kind of ride, find an examined life interesting, and are open to reinvention.


* * *

REBECCA KNUTH is a retired professor and expert on censorship and cultural destruction. Formerly at the University of Hawaii, she authored Libricide: The Regime-Sponsored Destruction of Books and Libraries in the 20th Century and has contributed to Smithsonian Magazine, Cabinet, History News Network, CBC Radio, and more. Transitioning to creative nonfiction, she earned another master's degree, her third, to add to her doctorate, and immersed herself in London's literary scene. Now a full-time writer, she published Emily Dickinson Had to Have Curls in 2024. She lives in Portland, Oregon where she coordinated the Sylvia Beach Writers Conference as part of the Oregon Writers Colony. Learn more at rebeccaknuth.com.

.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: ARE YOU TRYING TOO HARD TO WRITE

Friday, December 19, 2025

By Noelle Sterne

Is your writing forced? Stale? Flat? You may be trying too hard. I know when I am. The first sign is murmuring admiration of my turns of phrase. The second is imagining readers’ gasps of delight at my ingenuity. The third, and most important, is a yellow-red warning flare—Oh, oh, ego’s rising.

If I don’t pay attention to that flare, I know it heralds disaster. The work cannot help reflect this overconscious effort. Somehow, all the technique, wordplay, and resplendent diction overpower whatever message I want to convey.

The idea isn’t new; it’s been called the Law of Reversed Effort. Aldous Huxley said, “The harder we try with the conscious will to do something, the less we shall succeed.”

More specifically to us writers, in The Writer’s Book of Wisdom: 101 Rules for Mastering Your Craft, Stephen Taylor Goldsberry cautions, “Try not to overdo it. . . . Beware of contrived lyrical embellishment and fluffy metaphors” (p. 87). From my own work, I would add, beware of eloquent, balanced rhetoric. And repetition for effect. And overly ripe similes. And too-intricate expositions and too-pithy observations.

After reading Eat Pray Love, I read a transcript of an interview with Elizabeth Gilbert. When she worked on her next book, trying to imitate that first bestseller in the similar breezy, flippant, and pseudo-deep style, she produced 500 pages. Eventually realizing what she was doing, very courageously she junked the whole new manuscript.

Once Gilbert no longer tried to duplicate that success, she wrote a completely different book. Although Committed was not as successful as Eat Pray Love, its style and Gilbert’s reflections are honest and wholly appropriate to its subject, her misgivings about marriage.

Trying means we’re writing too self-consciously, usually to impress. In contrast, doing, as you probably know from your ecstatic writing stints, means total immersion. However many drafts we need, however many dives in the uncertain creative mud we can dare, our success rests not in trying but doing.

Like Gilbert in her post E-P-L foray, when we try to write impressively, even with all our might, we end up failing or at least falling short. Our writing lesson? Don’t try. Do—or don’t. Huxley has a lovely admonition: “Lightly, my child, lightly.”

Or maybe we’re moved not to write at all for a while. Or write a load of nonsense first, even though we know it’s crap. Or use the slash/option method incessantly (one of my favorites/best practices/most helpful methods/greatest techniques for skirting stuckness and continuing to slog). Maybe it means going back countless times to excise, refine, replace, restructure, or even, like Gilbert, pitch it all out.

So I tell myself, Stop trying to be clever and knowing. Stop trying to beat out your writing colleagues. Stop trying to show off your wit. Stop trying to replicate your recent success. All these tryings cut off your expressive truth and especially choke your honesty as a writer. Let’s all stop trying and watch our writing flow.

* * *

Writer, editor, writing coach, and spiritual counselor, Noelle Sterne (PhD) publishes stories, essays, and poems in writing, literary, educational, women’s, and spiritual venues. A professional editor, Noelle mentors writers in the throes of their novels and memoirs as well as exasperated graduate students to completion of their dissertations. Her two published books: Challenges in Writing Your Dissertation (Rowman & Littlefield, 2015) and Trust Your Life: Forgive Yourself and Go After Your Dreams (Unity Books, 2011). Pursuing her own dream, she is completing her third novel. www.trustyourlifenow.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read More »

Friday Speak Out!: When an Historian Writes Historical Fiction

Friday, December 12, 2025
By Nancy Bernhard

What’s the difference between writing history and writing historical fiction? As an historian turned novelist, I bring the same love of research and discovery to each project. I respect facts and timelines in my fiction, but when evidence ends, imagination steps in and I invent freely.

My novel The Double Standard Sporting House is set in an elite brothel in 1868 New York. At that time there were more than 500 brothels in the city, from dirt cheap and risky to wildly expensive and elegant, but we have very little evidence about the women working in any of them. The few contemporary studies reek of moral hypocrisy and the sexual double standard.

The women of premium brothels had intimate access to the most powerful men in the city, members of the corrupt Tammany Hall political machine at the height of its power. I chose this setting because I wanted to set the power of intimacy, compassion, and community against that based in competition, violence, and exploitation. My heroine is a healer who runs the brothel to fund her clinic for women, and to practice medicine as she sees fit.

My first question when researching 19th century prostitutes was: who were they? Many thousands scraping by as housemaids or needleworkers did it to supplement meager wages. 30% of women at that time did occasional sex work just to get by! In contrast, 1-2% of women do sex work today when we have access to many more kinds of employment.

Educated or middle-class girls most often found themselves in prostitution because they were seduced and abandoned, or raped. Cast out or ashamed, unable to return to their families or homes, it was often their only option, and it could be very lucrative. Apart from going on stage or trading stocks, owning a brothel was the only way for a single woman to gain property or earn a fortune.

I chose 1868 because of one half-line in historian Marilyn Wood Hill’s book Their Sisters’ Keepers: Prostitution in New York City, 1830-1870, describing “a brief but unique era when prostitution was managed predominantly by females.” That era ended when the Tammany Hall political machine gained control of the sex trade through trafficking and exploitation, which seeded my plot and antagonists.

I searched for evidence of these female entrepreneurs, but deep sources always came from the wrong place or time. Abbott Kahler’s delightful Sin in the Second City about a Chicago brothel in the early 20th century inspired some fun details. I thought I’d found a fascinating memoir by a madam called Nell Kimball who ran a house in 19th century St. Louis, but it turned out to be a fabrication—a complete fraud—by prolific author Stephen Longstreet.

Having read about 100 books on 19th century prostitution, women’s health, and Tammany Hall, I told as layered and authentic a story as I was able. You might say such thorough research only provides the backdrop to story and character, which do indeed come first in a novel. But a story and characters often resonate because they’re rooted in good history.

* * *
Nancy Bernhard is a journalism historian and yoga teacher, fascinated by how survivors of sexual and political violence heal through storytelling and movement. Having earned a BA in religion at Dartmouth, a PhD in American History at the University of Pennsylvania, and taught at Harvard, Bernhard turned her indignation over the sexual double standard into an absorbing tale rooted in the 19th century history of Tammany Hall. She was born in Brooklyn, and lives with her family in Somerville, Massachusetts.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Would you like to participate in Friday "Speak Out!"? Email your short posts (under 500 words) about women and writing to: marcia[at]wow-womenonwriting[dot]com for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read More »
Powered by Blogger.
Back to Top