Navigation menu

Thursday, January 23, 2025

Why Good Writers Read Bad Books

 
I've spent the last two weeks thinking about a book I just finished. No, sadly not because it was so great I couldn't wait to tell you all about it. I disliked it so much. This book was a handoff from a friend who gave it to me with the words, 

"This isn't the type of thing I read but I thought you..."

She, in turn, was given it by a friend of hers. Are we endlessly pawning off the only sold copy of this title, hoping to find someone who likes it? Ever the optimist, I sloughed through 300+ pages, certain it would ultimately "get better." By the last page I was asking myself why I had finished it. (Of course, the question of why readers finish books we are clearly not enjoying is a subject for another post.)

Not daring to pass it off to one of my book loving friends, I put it on my growing stack for the local library used book sale. Due to a combination of snow, cold weather (-4° this morning) and a bout of flu, the book stayed at the top of that stack, forcing me to think about it.

Readers are always eager to tell you a hundred different things they love about a book: the twists, the quirky characters, the beautiful setting descriptions, the unusual format, the humor...we will go on and on if given the chance. Have you ever asked a reader their opinion and they didn't like the book? Too often we are brief and unspecific. If we're polite, "It just wasn't for me." If we're direct, "Ugh, no." Sometimes you only get a pained look or a shake of the head. OK, on to the next title.

As only a person on the verge of cabin fever can, I began to obsess about the book. What exactly didn't I like about it? I picked it up one night, leafed through it and made a list!

  1. Character Names - Why do two unrelated characters in a book have to have the same first name? This quirk alternately annoyed and confused me. Of all the names in the world, you couldn't give everyone their own name? There were also two sets of related characters with the same first name. Also frustrating but a little more forgivable.
  2. Long Chapters - At the beginning of each 50+ page chapter there was a brief paragraph outlining political events happening in the city during the time period. Perfectly fine if you read every chapter in one setting. Stopping in the middle meant losing track of what decade we were in and having to page back to find the chapter beginning for a brush up. There sometimes being years between chapters made it difficult to keep track of how old the characters were at any given time. I had to do math! Also the vagueness about the passage of time didn't help me experience the story. At times I would be asking myself, is this later in the month or is it years later? 
  3. Character Evolution - The young man who hid a violent streak under gentlemanly manners became an old man who hid a violent streak under the veneer of money. The timid man eventually became head of the family but remained timid. The young women unsure of her groom's love on their wedding day was still unsure on the day he died. The bitter, homesick young woman died a bitter, homesick old woman. There were no epiphanies, no improvements, no spirals....just a steady march to death as the exact same people they were on page one, just a little older and richer.
  4. Impetus - Several times while reading, I put this book down for days and didn't think about it once. Didn't wonder what would happen next, didn't want to finish "just one one chapter", didn't try to sneak in just a few pages. In the beginning, I thought this family that was slowly climbing the economic ladder would be pushed off and have to crawl their way back to the top but , no. Basically they made money, found and lost love, died, made money, found and lost love, died...for several generations. Where were the surprises?

I realize these are just personal dislikes. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who love a generational sage about a slow and steady slog to the top while dealing with confusing time periods and names. But what did I do with this cranky list of mine? I opened up my WIP and read through with these complaints in mind, trying to ensure I wasn't subjecting any future readers to them.

Perhaps that is why we finish reading books we don't like. To pinpoint what we (and potentially our readers) won't like. What do we find annoying, uninspiring, confusing, boring, trite? What exactly makes us say "I don't like that book"? Then we can make a list and apply it to our own writing.

Have you ever been inspired to change your writing by a book you didn't like?


Jodi M. Webb writes from her home in the Pennsylvania mountains about everything from DIY projects to tea to butterflies. She's also a blog tour manager for WOW-Women on Writing and a writing tutor at her local university.  She recently c
hanged a character's name in her WIP because two woman who were close friends both had names that began with the letter M. No taking chances confusing people.Get to know her @jodiwebbwrites,  Facebook and blogging at Words by Webb. 




6 comments:

  1. I love this post, Jodi! You’re so right, we often talk about what we like in a book, but not what we don’t. I don’t know if it’s because we’re worried about spoiling it for others, but your “cranky list” is super helpful!

    If an author uses the same character name, there should be a purpose, either a plot twist, confusion or misunderstanding, or some other reason. Yikes, a fifty-page chapter is long. I’ve read that some characters don’t have a character arc, but that’s usually in mystery/thrillers, and tragic characters in dramas. I prefer dynamic characters over static ones, but I think some static characters are a nice contrast.

    So, I like the book I’m reading right now, but the way the author wrote it wasn’t the best choice. She wrote it in first person, so that we get one character’s perspective, and then she switches chapters to another first person character who tells the same story, but from her POV. The book would’ve been much more fluid and tighter if she wrote it in third person, so she could switch between characters when needed and not have to rehash every detail. Also, her first-person narratives were all telling (vs showing), almost memoir-ish, with backstory that would be better as scenes. It’s a bestseller, too! Surprising, but readers/reviewers point out how well it’s written, when I thought it was loose and sloppy. Oh well. It definitely inspired me to rethink some of my scenes, backstory, and POV!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Has a book I didn't like impacted my writing? Maybe. In college, I loathed Joyce his pointless-seeming meandering stories, run-on sentences. and so much more. My writing is direct and often a bit clipped. Is that as a result of having read Joyce or do I write in my preferred style which is why I loathed Joyce so completely.

    In general, I finish reading books I dislike that are for book club. Otherwise? Probably not unless I come back to it later.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I just finished reading something for my book club that I'm pretty sure no one else has finished! It's 450 pages long and I'm trying to figure out why it was so critically acclaimed. Oh heck, I'll name it. It's "The Devil in the White City" by Erik Larson. First of all, someone recommended it to our club by saying it was historical fiction. No, it's history. It's about the construction of the Chicago World's Fair and a serial killer operating in the city around the same time. It felt more like I was reading an academic thesis on engineering and architecture. The writing is poetic, but not when you're reading 50 pages at a time about how ten different architects had opposing views on how many buildings to construct in the fair. The part about the serial killer was only about one quarter of the book and left me with many questions. If it hadn't been a book club selection, I wouldn't have finished it--just wasn't my cup of tea. But I tried to take away what I could, highlighting passages of prose that struck me and new vocabulary words in my Kindle!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is an excellent example of varied tastes, because I LOVE THIS BOOK. But then I'm a historian who almost went into architectural drafting. And world's fair history from that time period fascinates me because it is so political.

      I made my book club read this. Several of them would commiserate with you.

      Delete
  4. That's funny Sue, but an excellent point. I think this book was marketed incorrectly in some circles as a true crime and that was what turned a lot of people off in our book club. We are more used to fast-paced thrillers, and that's not what "The Devil in the White City" is. I did learn a lot, and I could appreciate the monstrous amount of research and the prose, but I would advise people to know it's more about the history of this massive project and snapshot of Chicago in the late 1800s. There are probably other books that tell a better story of H.H. Holmes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's it exactly. Those of us who loved it, love history. And that's what we wanted to read. The crime element was interesting but not the central point for us.

      Delete

We love to hear from readers! Please leave a comment. :)